On 13 October 2009 the Belgian federal government decided to postpone the nuclear phase out of the three eldest nuclear plants with 10 years. This would mean that in the soon to be adopted new regulatory framework all Belgian nuclear plants will close between 2022 and 2025.
As a favour in return, GDF Suez and Electrabel would have agreed to pay 170 M EUR per annum from 2010 until 2014. The other nuclear market participants (EDF Belgium, SPE and eventually E.ON) will have to pay the remaining 45 to 75 M EUR per annum (until 2014). GDF Suez will also invest in R&D on CCS and nuclear waste, in renewable energy and in energy efficiency.
At the same time, a 'Follow Up Committee' will be installed. This Committee will be composed out of representatives of the nuclear producers, the government and the social partners, and of representatives of the National Bank of Belgium. The main tasks of this Committee will be to yearly evaluate the production costs of nuclear energy and to evaluate the electricity market prices. It will also have to verify that the household prices of all suppliers will in no way be higher than the average of the prices in the neighbouring countries.
The decisions still must be transposed into formal legislation. Nevertheless, some ideas can raise concerns about the development of a liberalised energy market in Belgium and about the position of other market players (will they contemplate building new power plants? will they be able to raise their market share?). From a legal point of view, it remains to be seen whether this decision to postpone the nuclear phase out will stand the test of EU law and of Belgian constitutional law.
In any case, interesting regulatory and legal times lay ahead.
A free English translation of the relevant excerpt from the governmental declaration will be send to you at first request. Please e-mail me.
Wednesday, 14 October 2009
Postponement of the nuclear phase out
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Hi Tim,
Reading the statement by the government, I have some problems with the interpretation with what will happen post 2014. The extra contribution coming from GDF Suez could be EUR 0 per annum, but could also be more than the annual amounts paid over the 2010-2014 timeframe. This is all dependent on the committee, the evolution of prices and costs ... What is your interpretation as a lawyer?
Regards
Dieter
Post a Comment